Limitations & Ethical Considerations
No system designed to model trust is immune from error, and Solyx is no exception. Despite its technical precision and behavioral focus, there are fundamental limitations and ethical boundaries that must be acknowledged.
False Positives / False Negatives
Machine learning models and heuristics are inherently probabilistic. This means that sometimes a legitimate wallet may be flagged as sybil-like due to anomalous behavior, or a manipulative actor may temporarily appear trustworthy by mimicking real users. Solyx addresses this by continuously iterating its models and supplementing them with community annotations. These user-submitted insights help correct mistakes, add nuance, and surface early warnings for edge cases the system might overlook.
Over-Reliance on Scores
A wallet’s behavior is complex and dynamic, and reducing its reputation to a single score risks oversimplification. Solyx is not meant to be a gatekeeper, it is a signaling tool. Protocols are encouraged to combine trust scores with other factors like annotations, historical contribution, or token ownership when making access or eligibility decisions. Relying solely on the score can lead to coordination failure or unfair exclusion.
Privacy vs. Public Accountability
Solyx does not collect or infer personal identities. However, it does create behavioral memory—a persistent fingerprint of what a wallet has done. This memory is pseudonymous but public. While this helps defend against sybils and scammers, it also introduces the risk of social labeling or misinterpretation. To balance this, all annotations are pseudonymous, scores are transparently generated, and users have the ability to contest, clarify, or annotate their own reputation.
Anti-Gaming Commitments
As with any reputation system, there’s always the risk of gaming. Bad actors may attempt to spoof high-trust behavior or farm scores through shallow engagement. Solyx is built with this reality in mind. The scoring engine decays trust over time, prioritizes long-term patterns over short bursts, and is continuously adapted to new gaming tactics. By treating adversarial pressure as a feature, not a bug, Solyx aims to remain resilient and responsive.
Last updated